Israel's Secret of the Secret
Heard of Dimona? Sure you haven't. Israel doesn't want you to know about it. Hell, they jailed the only person who managed to get into it. His photographs are still the only ones available to document what lies within.
Ladies and gentlemen, presenting ... Dimonahttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yf39qkvwOhUNow that you know about Dimona, here's another video to watch. It's a BBC documentary titled: Israel's Secret Weapon. It's long. But you don't have to watch all five parts, here's the first part and you only need to watch the opening scenes to discover what many people do not know. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGQmTyJ3SKoIf you can't watch it, let me summarize the scenes for you:1) Which country in the Middle East has undeclared nuclear weapons?2) Which country in the Middle East has undeclared biological and chemical capabilities?3) Which country in the Middle East has no outside inspections?4) Which country jailed its nuclear whistleblower for 18 years?If you answered Iran or Iraq, you've got it all wrong. It's the other 'I'. Israel.Now do you realise the bloody double standards America is putting on Iran for their supposed nuclear weapons? Israel has them and doesn't even have inspections! Why not? Why do they have nuclear weapons in the first place? And why are they undeclared? If there's anything I've learnt about conspiracies, it's this: if they've got something to hide, it's almost always sinister.
Lie Upon Lie
On 19 April, Cinnamon Stillwell wrote an anti-conspiracy 9/11 piece for the San Francisco Chronicle. It cynically dismissed legitimate concerns about 9/11 and labeled anyone who voiced them as anti-semitic extremists.http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/gate/archive/2006/04/19/cstillwell.DTLThe next day, the paper retracted that article after a brazen lie was found. http://www.sfgate.com/pages/corrections/The statement reads:"Cinnamon Stillwell's column Wednesday on SFGate originally stated that images of the plane that struck the Pentagon had been seen by the American public. No such images have been made public."http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2006/200406issueretraction.htmIf Stillwell can't even get this right, what other piles of horse manure has her shoddy research led her into?Not just horse, but bull manure too!When Bush first got to know of the attacks on World Trade Center, he was in an elementary school, listening to a story about a pet goat. Well, guess what? He stayed on!"How did the United States Secret Service Protective Detail, know they did not need to immediately move the President? How did they know they did not need to toss him into his bomb-proof limo and start driving in any direction to foil a possible inbound?""How did the United States Secret Service Protective Detail know that by leaving the President where he was, they were not making targets of all those students and teachers?""How did the United States Secret Service Protective Detail KNOW FOR A FACT THAT PRESIDENT BUSH WAS NOT A TARGET THAT DAY?"If journalists lie to support the official 9/11 story, who is telling the truth? I rest my case.
Murderers
A flashback from 2003:http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/content_objectid=13087653_method=full_siteid=50143_headline=-US-TROOPS-ADMIT-SHOOTING-IRAQI-CIVILIANS-name_page.html
As distrust of the invading forces increases amongst the local population US soldiers said they have killed civilians without hesitation, shot injured opponents and abandoned them to die in agony.And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line coming out from the Pentagon's spin doctors Specialist Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no dilemma when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled the trigger.
"It was up close and personal the whole time, there wasn't a big distance. If they were there, they were enemy, whether in uniform or not. Some were, some weren't."So there you go, the 'liberating' American soldiers.
Meet Dr. Doom
http://www.sas.org/tcs/weeklyIssues_2006/2006-04-07/feature1p/index.htmlBut there was a gravely disturbing side to that otherwise scientifically significant meeting, for I watched in amazement as a few hundred members of the Texas Academy of Science rose to their feet and gave a standing ovation to a speech that enthusiastically advocated the elimination of 90 percent of Earth's population by airborne Ebola. The speech was given by Dr. Eric R. Pianka the University of Texas evolutionary ecologist and lizard expert who the Academy named the 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist.Professor Pianka said the Earth as we know it will not survive without drastic measures. Then, and without presenting any data to justify this number, he asserted that the only feasible solution to saving the Earth is to reduce the population to 10 percent of the present number.Now do you see why conspiracy theories are a good thing? Could the AIDS, SARS and the present H5N1 (bird flu) virus be started by these maniacs? Why not? Heck, or even the famine in Somalia or Niger? If they can bring rain (cloud seeding), they can bloody hell stop it! After all, they do want to reduce the population, don't they? Any why don't I see anybody yelling: "Terrorist!" at Dr. Pianka? He's proposing killing 5 billion people and no one is calling him 'terrorist'?What the F*!?
NWO
If that's not Fascist, what is? Uncle Sam is wiretapping your lines, overhearing every single word uttered without legal permission - aren't we surprised?http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/columns/name.htm[JM] Hello, I'm John Mearsheimer, and I'm a professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago.
[SW] And I'm Stephen Walt, professor of International Affairs at The John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.[SW] Well, we have just published a detailed examination of the intimate relationship between America and Israel and, in particular, how that drives America's Middle East policy.
[JM] Yes, it is called "The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy" and a 21-page extract was just published by the London Review of Books, which is what has drawn all the recent media attention. The full 82-page article is posted at Harvard's web site.[JM] Most Americans don't seem to know that Washington has provided Israel with a level of support dwarfing that given to any other state. It is the largest recipient in total since World War Two, to the tune of well over $140 billion (in 2004 dollars). Israel receives about $3 billion in direct assistance each year, roughly one-fifth of the foreign aid budget, and worth about $500 a year for every Israeli.
[SW] And, believe it or not, Israel is the only recipient that does not have to account for how the aid is spent, which makes it virtually impossible to prevent the money from being used for purposes the US opposes...The US gives Israel access to intelligence it denies to its Nato allies and has turned a blind eye to Israel's acquisition of nuclear weapons.
[JM] Since 1982, the US has vetoed 32 Security Council resolutions critical of Israel, more than the total number of vetoes cast by all the other Security Council members. It blocks the efforts of Arab states to put Israel's nuclear arsenal on the IAEA's agenda.Read on to find out why Harvard removed its logo from the paper and ceased association with it. Hmm, I wonder why? The lobby groups at work?http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/4875606.stmChina may reduce the amount of US bonds it holds as part of its foreign exchange reserves, an influential official has reportedly said. China is a major funder of US debt, holding about £260bn (£149bn) in US Treasury bonds - second only to Japan. Any reduction in China's dollar assets could hit the US economy. Should China cut its US dollar holdings, this could drive up long-term yields on US bonds, which could in turn put pressure on interest rates.Ta - da!