Moonwalk?

http://216.26.168.193/moonmovie/default.asp

The Space Shuttle, so far, has killed fourteen people, merely trying to attain an orbit about two hundred fifty miles above the Earth. How is it then, that a third of a century ago, with less computing power in the entire rocket than in a present day twenty dollar Wal-Mart watch, NASA claims to have gone 100,000% farther, six different times between 1969 and 1972, landing on another celestial body and then returning, without ever killing anyone?

I salute the director - this is brilliant investigative reporting. He took great lengths and risks to get to the truth. The Moon Landing that you and I were brainwashed with while in school is nothing but a lie. Kudos to Brat Sibrel! You tha Man!



The astronauts have it easy - just swear to God that they did orbit/walk on the moon. What's so difficult about swearing something you know as the truth? I can only conclude - they have something to hide.

Your friendly astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin even had the tenacity to punch (yes, punch) Bart when he was pressed to swear on the Bible. Not only that, the astronauts gave differing testimonies as to what happened while in space.

You bloody LIARS!!

Blood Brothers

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/3/24/211631/479

Bush: But now that I'm on Iran, the threat to Iran, of course, the threat from Iran is, of course, their stated objective to destroy our strong ally Israel. That's a threat, a serious threat. It's a threat to world peace; it's a threat, in essence, to a strong alliance. I made it clear, I'll make it clear again, that we will use military might to protect our ally, Israel.

I believe this is the first time that a U.S. president has publicly said that we will fight to protect Israel. In all of Israel's previous wars, we supplied intelligence, military equipment and political support, but never did we commit the American military to fighting for Israel.

But we've never said that American soldiers will fight and die for Israel.

Until now.

Like they say: "Blood Brothers."

This is backed by a study from Harvard (which has ceased its association with the paper).

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0323-09.htm

"Why has the United States been willing to set aside its own security and that of many of its allies in order to advance the interests of another state?" ask authors John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago and Stephen Walt of the John F. Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

A few days ago, you could download a copy of that paper with Harvard's logo on it. Today, you can't. Because our lovely brothers from Israel doesn't seem to like that we know they control the United States of America.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march2006/240306supportsheen.htm

Despite the best efforts of the now whimpering attack poodles of the mainstream media, an online CNN poll shows that over four-fifths, or 82 per cent, agree with actor Charlie Sheen that the U.S. government covered up the real events of the 9/11 attacks.

They know where they stand. Where do you stand?

WTO, IMF, World Bank

The three institutions of globalisation. The epitome of today's economy. Really?

Through them, the rich are made richer and the poor are made poorer. They buy up foreign resources, in the disguise of 'helping' the locals to generate income but they help themselves to the riches instead.

A short working example: World Bank loans country A $2 billion dollars to fund an oil drilling site on the condition that contract must be given to a certain company (hint: American) like ExxonMobil. Once ExxonMobil starts making money from that site, the country A has to pay back its debt with interest. How do the people of country A actually benefit? They don't.

The $2 billion dollars doesn't even leave the US, it is merely transferred from World Bank into ExxonMobil. Where does country A fit in? By paying back the money with interest.

This is your so called epitome of 21st century economy. BloodSuckers.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/4823842.stm

The attack comes against a background of rising anger at Western mining and energy interests in Indonesia.

There have also been demonstrations in Java against a decision to make the American Exxon Mobil company the operator of an oil and gas field owned jointly with Indonesia's state energy company.

http://cgi.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/03/16/indonesia.jayapura.ap/

"We have huge natural resources, but why are they extracted by foreigners while the Papuans are still poor?"

From AFP & AP:
"Freeport Indonesia will continue its efforts to ensure that the local people of Papua will share in the economic and social benefits resulting from its operations," the firm said.

The company currently gives 1 percent of its annual profits to seven tribal groups living near the mine.

Did you get that? The US mining company (Freeport-McMoran) shares not 30, 20, 10 or even 5 percent. It gives a ridiculous 1 percent of its profits to the most deserving people - the locals. If you were to open a shop with a partner, would you be happy if he spilt the earnings at 99% for him and 1% for yourself? Of course you wouldn't. That's why the people of Papua are protesting.

Again, BloodSuckers.

Countdown

Swweett video! Just shows the stark reality of things.

Here's the transcript: http://www.boston-legal.org/19-stickit/ep19-stickit.shtml#dialogue

http://cbs4denver.com/topstories/local_story_075085925.html

Former United Nation's weapons inspector Scott Ritter told several hundred people at the University of Colorado Wednesday night that the war in Iraq was based on a lie."The foundation of our involvement in Iraq is as corrupt as you can possibly imagine," Ritter said. "We went to war on a lie."

Bob Martinez, chair of the Colorado Republican Party, was outside Ritter's speech in Boulder. He said Ritter's comments were irresponsible."We're at war with Islamo-Fascists who have vowed to destroy our way of life," Martinez said. "The students should remember the scenes that they watched on September 11th and what really happened that day."

Well, Mr. Martinez, just so you know, 9/11 was a lie too.

http://www.antiwar.com/roberts/?articleid=8713

Is Another 9/11 in the Works?

Just like how 9/11 was responsible for the invasion of Afghanistan and subsequently Iraq, we might yet see another 9/11-type event as a pre-text for attacking Iran. Bush needs all the convincing he can as he is now very unpopular with his people. This will definitely do the trick.

Meen Erhabe?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4804666.stm

Mr Olmert also said the Israeli authorities would finish the controversial West Bank barrier by the end of the year.

The International Court of Justice issued an advisory ruling in 2004 that the barrier breached international law where it is built on occupied territory and should be dismantled.

That wall is against international law. Yet Israel is adamant on keeping it. Meen Erhabe?

http://www.aljazeerah.info/News%20archives/2006%20News%20Archives/March/12n/Israeli%20Police%20Assaults%20Venezuelans%20Ambassador%20at%20AlAqsa%20Mosque.htm

Israeli Occupation Policemen on Saturday violently beat up the Ambassador of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela H.E. Dr. Rafael Leal, at the intersection of the one gate of Al Aqsa mosque strongly pressed him and barred him access into the mosque but the immediate intervention by the mosque's custodians bring a halt to the abusive treatment.

Beating up an international diplomat. Meen Erhabe?

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article350586.ece

Israeli ministers were secretly warned just after the Six-Day War in 1967 that any policy of building settlements across occupied Palestinian territories violated international law.

Growth of Jewish settlements over the next three decades followed.

Meen Erhabe (Who's the Terrorist)?

Dumb American Arrogance

They have the bloody cheek to state which country US should invade next but haven't the slightest brains to pinpoint the land itself. Is this your average American?

Israeli Arrogance

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/4789832.stm

Under Wilson, Britain also sold Israel tons of chemicals used to make boosted atom bombs 20 times more powerful than Hiroshima or even Hydrogen Bombs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/4743493.stm

Mr McNamara, who became President Kennedy's defence secretary in 1961, has expressed his surprise to Newsnight that Britain didn't inform the Americans it had sold heavy water to Israel: "The fact that Israel was trying to develop a nuclear bomb should not have come as any surprise... But that Britain should have supplied it with heavy water was indeed a surprise to me.

This shows the obvious and blatant evidence that Israel acquired nuclear capability secretly. But did anyone do anything about it? Nooooo.

Israel achieved nuclear competency without having to sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty, meaning they won't allow any UN inspections on their nuclear sites. But did anyone do anything about it? Nooooo.

And here they quibble about Iran's non-existent plan to build nuclear weapons.

Bull - F*ck*ng - Shit

Jews or Palestinians?

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/3/8/91958.shtml?s=lh

Jewish settlers are terrorizing Palestinians with impunity, attacking children on their way to school and destroying farmers' trees and crops, a U.N. expert on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict said in a report.

And we wonder why this isn't reported in the major news networks.

Further evidence of Israel's aggression:
http://today.reuters.com/news/newsarticle.aspx?type=worldNews&storyid=2006-03-08T142833Z_01_L08205988_RTRUKOC_0_US-NUCLEAR-IRAN-ISRAEL.xml&rpc=22

If the U.N. Security Council is incapable of taking action to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, Israel will have no choice but to defend itself, Israel's defense minister said on Wednesday.

I wonder, defend itself from what? Here we have a nuclear-capable 'country' (Israel) trying to 'defend' itself from a country (Iran) with as-yet-to-be-confirmed nuclear capability. Who's the aggressor here?

http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=6082

Several “anti-Zionist Jewish rabbis are in Tehran to take part in the conference”, the news agency added.

Wish I could attend.

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=politicsNews&storyID=2006-03-09T050011Z_01_N08160438_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-SPENDING.xml

The committee cut most of the $75 million Bush sought for new pro-democracy efforts in Iran, calling the plan announced with fanfare last month poorly justified.

Isn't it interesting to note that Bush wanted $75 million for 'pro-democracy efforts in Iran'? This is a small little clue as to what the war on Iran will be about. Toppling the existing government (like in Iraq), steal their oil and put a US puppet to govern the Iranians. Slam-bam-thank you Ma'am. That's US foreign policy in less than 20 words.

If you've followed the news on Iran closely, doesn't it resemble the events that occured almost 4 years ago? It was about Iraq and their supposed WMDs. Fastforward today and it's about Iran and their supposed nuclear weapons. We've already seen how they lied about the WMDs. Are we going to buy their statement regarding Iran?

One word: BullShit

Holocaust Hoax

I deny the Holocaust - so imprison me!

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1139395515686&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

The timing of Austria's conviction and imprisonment of David Irving for denying the Holocaust could not have been worse. Coming after the deaths of at least 30 people in Syria, Lebanon, Afghanistan, Libya, Nigeria and other Islamic countries during protests against cartoons ridiculing Muhammad, the Irving verdict makes a mockery of the claim that in democratic countries freedom of expression is a basic right.

The double standards continue.
And you're wondering why thousands of Indonesians staged an anti-US protest?

http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3593962a12,00.html

“What Ahmadinejad said about the Holocaust was in our bosoms”, the former German chancellor was quoted as saying. “For years we wanted to say this, but we did not have the courage to speak out”.

http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=6086

International Red Cross documents clearly show that fewer than 300,000 Jews died during WWII in all German concentration camps combined. As a race, Jews gave far fewer to the war efforts than did any other nation involved, which is why their total population increased during the war, in contrast to that of most combatants.

http://www.conspiracypenpal.com/rants/holy.htm

So what's with the magic 6 million figure?

The Talmud called for cleansing the "chosen" souls through the sacrifice of 6 million in "burning ovens," since unclean souls could not be allowed to return to the Promised Land. That is the real source of the "6 million" myth, as well as the myth of the "ovens."

Yup, these Zionists are so brave they even have the cheek to cheat their God!

United States of Israel

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11684031

US Ambassador speaking to 4,500 delegates to the annual convention of the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, the leading pro-Israel U.S. lobbying group

What relationship does the US and Israel have? Is it any wonder why US keeps supporting Israel? Or does Israel control America?

Here's something to help you decide:

“Every time we do something, you tell me Americans will do this and will do that. I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel; we, the Jewish People, control America. And the Americans know it.”

- Ariel Sharon (Israeli Prime Minister), IAP News, October 3, 2001

See the picture?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4031603.stm

Scroll to the bottom

Does not Israel have a nuclear bomb?

Yes. Israel however is not a party to the NPT, so is not obliged to report to it. Neither are India or Pakistan, both of which have developed nuclear weapons. North Korea has left the treaty and has announced that it has acquired a nuclear weapon capacity

No wonder Israel has no problems having nuclear weapons! It doesn't even have to report to IAEA about its nuclear capability. Even North Korea admitted its nuclear ambitions. So what's the big deal about Iran?

Simple! - as with Iraq.

"Look, the primary difference - to put it a little too simply - between North Korea and Iraq is that we have virtually no options with Iraq because the country floats on a sea of oil."

- Paul Wolfowitz, 2003 Asian Security Conference

See? Like the Iraqis, those darn Iranians got them OIL too!

And here's a little something to stimulate the senses:

• Video - US Troops Bemoan Not Being Able To Shoot Iraqi Kids Who Threw Rocks. Press Play.

Source: PrisonPlanet.Com, http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/december2005/151205threwrocks.htm